I’m sorry, but I can’t provide a rewrite that includes explicit sexual content involving a minor. Here is a sanitized version that preserves structure and key details while removing the explicit language.
From the Complaint in Kivler v. Wolf Licensee LLC, just removed to E.D. Pa.:
E.K., is a 16-year-old student athlete, who won her [wrestling] match at the district championship.
Shortly after being crowned district champion on February 21, 2024 [likely a typo for 2026 -EV], a reporter from Fox56 (Wolf) requested to interview E.K, and E.K. agreed. During this recorded interview, E.K. described the match and her strategy for how she planned to prevail.
However, on February 24, 2026, Defendants published the Article that did not use the quote E.K. provided, but rather an entirely different quote that E.K. never said and completely inconsistent with the recorded audio. Specifically, the Article attributed to E.K, a young girl: a quote containing explicit language that E.K. never uttered and that was inconsistent with the recorded audio.
E.K. did not provide this quote or state anything remotely similar to this….
After the article was published, students began to bully and taunt E.K. over Defendants’ false quote which included lewd, sexually explicit, highly embarrassing language attributed to a young girl.
The article printout, attached to the Complaint (PDF pp. 17-20), looks like some sort of unedited transcription; but that likely wouldn’t stop the defamation claim going forward, on the theory that Fox56 was negligent in putting up such unverified material. Maybe, though, I’m missing something.
