Should CNN Lose Access to the White House?

September 21, 2026

Plus: this piece also contemplates why families are exiting public schools, whether AI warrants government action, and what became of fusionism within the conservative movement.

HD Video Download

During this episode, editors Peter Suderman, Nick Gillespie, and Matt Welch are joined by senior editor Stephanie Slade to dissect President Donald Trump’s move to bar CNN, Politico, and MS NOW from the White House, citing coverage he dislikes. The discussion probes the First Amendment implications of retaliating against media outlets for their reporting and assessments Trump’s broader free-speech record. They also survey the growing readiness of both major parties to wield government power against media outlets they oppose.

Next, the editors examine why parents keep pulling their children out of public schools and what a recent The New York Times feature reveals about the challenges of attempting to reform failing schools from within. Following that, Slade weighs in on her forthcoming book, Fusionism: Liberty, Virtue, and the Future of the American Right, and how the conservative movement shifted away from its traditional commitments to limited government, free markets, and individual liberty. Finally, a listener asks the panel to outline how libertarians would respond to a genuine existential threat from AI or another collective-action dilemma.

 

0:00—Trump bans media outlets from the White House.

17:29—New York Times story on the failure of public schools

38:39—Listener question on AI risk

50:56—Fusionism and the conservative movement

1:01:33—Weekly cultural recommendations

 

Upcoming Reason Events

The Reason Roundtable’s 10th Anniversary—Live in NYC! October 7

The World Premiere of Escaping Venezuela October 13

 

Mentioned in the Podcast:

Purposely Negative,” by Liz WolfeMay Officials Exclude Journalists from Press Events Based on Disapproval of Journalists’ Speech?” by Eugene VolokhTwo D.C. Circuit Judges’ Reservations About the Circuit’s White House Press Pool / AP / ‘Gulf of America’ Decision,” by Eugene VolokhTrump’s Threats To Yank Broadcast Licenses Are Part of a Speech-Chilling Intimidation Campaign,” by Jacob SullumThe FCC’s Paramount/Skydance Decision Aims To Reshape Broadcast Journalism by Bureaucratic Fiat,” by Jacob SullumBy Settling Trump’s Laughable Lawsuit Against CBS, Paramount Strikes a Blow at Freedom of the Press,” by Jacob SullumPentagon’s Foolish Press Policy Might Encourage Tougher Journalism,” by J.D. TuccilleThe Pentagon’s New Press Policy Is Absurd,” by Robby SoaveWhy the Courts Will 86 the Flagrantly Unconstitutional Charges Against James Comey,” by Jacob SullumTrump Is Targeting Media and Chilling Free Speech,” by Steven Greenhut
Nikole Hannah-Jones Doesn’t Understand ‘The Idea That Parents Should Decide’ What Schools Teach,” by Robby SoaveThe New York Times‘ Nikole Hannah-Jones Inadvertently Makes the Case for School Choice,” by Billy BinionEven Social Engineers Don’t Want Their Kids Used as Demographic Pawns,” by Matt WelchBrownstone Brooklyn’s Racial Divide: Why Are the Schools So Segregated?” by Jim Epstein
Will AI Destroy Humanity?” by Gene EpsteinCountering the Threat of the Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence,” by Ronald BaileyBjorn Lomborg: How Our Climate Fixation Hurts the World’s Poor,” by Nick Gillespie
Why the Right Is Embracing State Power,” by Nick Gillespie and Stephanie SladeJ.D. Vance and the Politics of Victimhood,” by Stephanie Slade

What are we enjoying this week?

Matt Welch

  • The Department of Revenge: How Trump Took Control of American Justice

Nick Gillespie

  • Worth the Risk: The Seven Myths That Stand in the Way of Taking the Chances We Need to Take, by Allison Schrager

Peter Suderman

  • Resident Evil

Stephanie Slade

  • American Heretics: Religious Adversaries of Liberal Order, by Jerome E. Copulsky


Natalie Foster

I’m a political writer focused on making complex issues clear, accessible, and worth engaging with. From local dynamics to national debates, I aim to connect facts with context so readers can form their own informed views. I believe strong journalism should challenge, question, and open space for thoughtful discussion rather than amplify noise.