NATIONALISM. Nordfront and the Nordic Resistance Movement attended the annual Lukov March in the Bulgarian capital Sofia on 12 February. Below follows a short report from the demonstration.
Nationalists gathered in Sofia last Saturday to honour Hristo Lukov at the annual Lukov March, which is held in connection with the general’s death.
In recent years, the demonstration has been opposed by the authorities, after the World Jewish Congress put pressure on Bulgarian politicians. In both 2021 and 2022, the organisers – the Bulgarian National Union (BNU) – won a court battle for permission to hold the demonstration.
This year, approximately one thousand Bulgarian nationalists and foreign comrades gathered at the event. Among those attending were reporters from Nordfront and a traditional delegation from the Nordic Resistance Movement, who walked in the march with the organisation’s Tyr rune flags. Nationalists from other countries, including France and Germany, were also present.
Martin Saxlind with European comrades
The police presence during the day was particularly large, with police officers positioned in pairs on many street corners. A weak counter-demonstration was also organised, which drew just over 100 people.
At 17.30 local time, the gathering began at the National Palace of Culture, where several speeches were held by representatives of the Bulgarian National Union. However, at the last second, the mayor suddenly announced that the Lukov March would not be allowed to proceed, citing safety concerns in the city.
Luckily, the organisers were well prepared for such a move, following attempts to stop the march in previous years, and had already applied for permission for three different smaller demonstrations.
Pär Sjögren is interviewed by RT’s Ruptly TV:
The flags of the Nordic Resistance Movement among other European flagsMarkus Nordh and Niklas Norling from the Nordic Resistance Movement
The assembled nationalists accordingly divided themselves into groups and took different routes. The group Nordfront joined stopped halfway en route to the final destination to listen to a speech by the main organiser of the march, Plamen Dimitrov. Dimitrov has been a guest on Radio Nordfront on more than one occasion, and is both the local leader of the BNU in Sofia and the representative for the organisation’s international relations.
Plamen Dimitrov gives a speech during the march
After Dimitrov’s speech, the march headed in the direction of the hero general’s home, where he was murdered by Bolsheviks on 13 February 1943. There, further speeches were held by more BNU representatives.
BNU members display a portrait of the hero general Hristo LukovA speech outside the hero general’s home
The demonstration was conducted without disruptions and concluded around 20.00. Although the organisers succeeded in outmanoeuvring the police’s ban, the police still behaved correctly and followed the demonstration from a distance. The few left-wing extremists that protested against the march were no problem for the police to keep away.
A small group of anti-fascists who wanted to besmirch the memory of Hristo Lukov
After the demonstration, a gathering was held at the BNU headquarters.
ACTIVISM. Sweden’s Nest 3 launched a new campaign under the slogan “For Blood and Soil” in Ängelholm last weekend.
Activists met in Ängelholm on Saturday, 12 February, to begin a new campaign under the name “For Blood and Soil”.
The activists took their positions with a banner on a pedestrian street in the town centre, where Daniel Gerdås gave a speech.
Excerpts from the speech:
Man is not the master of nature; man is a part of nature. Man is just as bound and subject to nature’s laws as every other living creature. Nature cannot just be bled dry. Sooner or later, she will strike back at us. When our soils are depleted, our forests dead and the oceans emptied of all life, what will we live on?
Capitalism must be crushed!
The exploitation must cease, and we must see ourselves as a part of nature!
“For Blood and Soil”
Specially designed leaflets on the theme were handed out to passers-by.
After visiting central Ängelholm and spreading the Nordic Resistance Movement’s environmentally friendly, pro-nature message, the activists went to a bridge over the E6 motorway in the eastern part of town for a banner action.
Several hundred cars passed under the Resistance Movement’s flags and banner, with many drivers beeping their horns, waving and giving the thumbs-up to the National Socialists. After a while, the police came to register the opinions of the activists and search them, which made the activity even more prominent to onlookers. Finding nothing illegal and feeling somewhat disappointed, the police were forced to release the activists without criminal suspicion.
The Resistance Movement interviewed activist CedricHöglund about the newly launched campaign:
Can you tell us a bit more about the new campaign and why you started it?
Protecting our blood and soil is the very core of our ideology. We fight for the blood that flows in our veins, and for the survival and freedom of the Nordic people. We also fight to protect nature, which gives us everything we need to live; however, like our people’s existence, it is threatened today by greedy globalists who think only of economic gain and are destroying our planet with our corrupt rulers’ permission.
The goal of the campaign is precisely what Daniel Gerdås said when interviewed about the matter; namely, to take back the issues of animal rights and environmentalism from the Left, who have long believed they have a monopoly on these important matters. We aim to inform the general public that only National Socialist policies can save our environment, and that the Nordic Resistance Movement is the only true green movement.
How important are environmental issues compared with the population replacement and mass immigration?
Stopping the population replacement will naturally be the Resistance Movement’s most urgent and prioritised task after coming to power. However, the destruction of nature and the environment is a very pressing issue as well. With this campaign, we want to show that the Resistance Movement is not solely focussed on one topic – as many Swedes seem to believe – but rather that we are a movement with a complete worldview that covers all of life’s conceivable issues. We want to show that we not only intend to improve the lives of the Nordic people, but also those of our flora and fauna, via policies that are in harmony with the laws of nature.
How was the message received by the public?
It was received pretty well, actually. The specially produced leaflets and banner seemed to interest a lot of people who would have usually just walked past. However, the police were a little annoying this time. It’s aggravating when the police don’t know anything about Swedish law and have to wait for orders from their superiors, who almost always tell them the same thing we do. Of course, this did not affect our moral, and we will naturally continue to encourage our people to join the struggle at an unabated pace.
Thank you for the interview!
“Blood and Soil – Man is a part of nature and is subject to nature’s laws, like all other living creatures. In order for our people to survive, our environment and our wildlife must also survive!”
RESISTANCE MOVEMENT. Now that the Icelandic branch’s website is back online, we present an annual review of the Nordic Resistance Movement’s activities in Iceland in 2021.
The 2021 report for the Icelandic branch of the Nordic Resistance Movement was delayed due to having to change web domains twice last year. For now, the Icelandic website can be found at nordurvigi.se.
Propaganda was spread all over Iceland in 2021, most frequently in the Reykjavik area and in East Iceland. It was also spread in Snæfellsnes and the Westfjords, North Iceland, the south coast and on the Reykjanes peninsula.
“Iceland Awakes!”
We carried out extensive activism on 1 May and were the only movement to take to the streets to put up posters and banners for the second year in a row. We used the slogan “Class with Class” [i.e., the unification of the classes], which was written on two banners placed on bridges, while posters were put up with the messages “National community instead of class struggle!” and “Workers of the North unite!” This was followed by a 1 May article in Icelandic.
“National community instead of class struggle!” / “Workers of the North unite!”
On Iceland’s National Day, 17 June, we put up stickers and posters and wrote an accompanying article to encourage people to follow in Jón Sigurðsson’s footsteps and protest against internationalism.
In August, we took part in a pan-Nordic operation and put up “White Lives Matter” stickers on Indigenous Peoples’ Day.
On election day, we placed signs that read “Enjoy your ONE day of democracy”, together with the organisation’s symbols. This was accompanied by an article entitled “Vote for Iceland!”
This year we will produce more episodes of Landsmenn and continue writing articles and conducting prominent actions. We want to encourage more people in Iceland to have the courage to join or support us – especially young people. We have a bright future in 2022 and will continue the struggle for the existence of our nation and the other Nordic countries unabated.
To the young people of Iceland:
Why lose yourself in a life of entertainment that drags you down spiritually and brings you an empty existence consisting solely of eating, watching TV, having fun, talking on the phone and playing video games? Our freedom of speech is being restricted on a daily basis, and the existence of our people is being threatened. Iceland has not received any concessions in these matters. You are being lied to every day and manipulated by a globalist clique that is pushing multiculturalism and Cultural Marxism at school and during other social activities. Engage in a movement that strengthens you and provides knowledge about your people and culture. Join us and be proud to do your part for your people!
NORDIC FRONTIER. TANSTAAFL from Age-of-Treason.com joins us this week to talk about the concept of Jewing and we will find out if there are any reasonable levels of antisemitism.
GLOBALISM. Russleman writes about a newly discovered document from one of the United Nations’ educational programmes, which emphasises the role of the “holocaust” as the moral basis of globalisation and White genocide.
A recently discovered document from “The Holocaust and the United Nations Outreach Programme” highlights the critical role of the “holocaust” myth in shaping a moral foundation for the Western elite’s globalist/neo-liberal world project. The document, which is entitled “The Future of Holocaust Education: The Role of Global Citizenship and Human Rights Literacy”, refers explicitly to tikun olam (Hebrew for “heal/repair the world”), which is a fundamentally anti-White concept that seeks the extermination of the White race as revenge for perceived crimes committed against Jews by National Socialist Germany (even though all Whites must ultimately be destroyed to “heal the world”).
The programme originates from the “Holocaust Remembrance resolution”, which was unanimously adopted by the UN General Assembly in 2005. According to the document, the resolution should be seen as an acknowledgement of the “need to develop a new cosmopolitan memory of the Holocaust that transcends ethnic and national boundaries”, and which stands in contrast to “xenophobia, racism and hate”.
From the document:
Tikun Olam (Repairing the World)
The future of Holocaust memory and education lies in its ability to be relevant to the students of coming generations. While study about the Holocaust is important in and of itself, it is even more important to learn from the Holocaust in terms of promoting global citizenship, human rights, religious tolerance and multiculturalism to ensure that such evil does not occur again.
In many locations worldwide, the Holocaust has become a universal symbol of evil. Just as the story of the Exodus from Egypt from the Bible, and the catch cry “Let my people go” epitomises moving from slavery towards freedom, the Holocaust is now the defining symbol of the most terrible denial of basic human rights – an evil that we struggle to comprehend.
Paradoxically, we can transform teaching about the Holocaust from a subject of despair to a subject of hope. We can convey to our students the message that the option of preventing the next Holocaust is in our own hands. Our students can take specific steps to counter racism and hatred on a local, granular level and this will impact at the universal, international level.
In this way, adolescents can become agents of change. The most important educational message of tikun olam, repairing the world, is that we must not be indifferent, we must not be bystanders, because indifference is lethal. We have to act! We must be agents and facilitators against the evils of discrimination, prejudice, hatred and violence. All teachers need to equip their students with the intellectual and practical tools to deal with complex historical situations.
Thus Holocaust Education should be constructed in such a way that the world can counter hatred – whether based on race, ethnic background, colour, gender or religion.
This quote not only emphasises how the “holocaust” is the fundamental myth behind the globalist/neo-liberal world project, but also the innate absurdity of invoking the very same “holocaust” myth to counteract this project, as kosher right-wing and left-wing political actors often do.
Examples of this are ubiquitous, from counter-jihadists’ endless attempts to compare fascism to Islamism, to more recent cases of unvaccinated people invoking “holocaust victim status” while condemning the “fascist vaccine regime”.
The HatWRKS store in Nashville, USA, sells “holocaust status” badges for the unvaccinated. Photo: Instagram.
The fact that so many instinctively go straight to the “holocaust” to emphasise their status as the oppressed reveals how deep this Jewish myth has been engraved into our collective subconscious as the ultimate moral reference point, and how it is one of the pillars of Jewish power. You simply cannot use the “holocaust” to advance your own political agenda as a non-Jew; and for us Whites, it is directly counterproductive, as the only thing you achieve is to legitimise the fundamental moral myth behind the neo-liberal globalist system.
Also from the document:
The growing strength of populist and far right groups in Europe must concern us all. The worldwide wave of antisemitism in which innocent Jews are attacked solely for being Jewish while walking the streets of Sydney, Melbourne, Brussels, Paris and Rome has to worry us. The decapitation ceremonies by the Islamic State should cause us sleepless nights. It’s not enough to make general statements of a universal nature about unavoidable, banal evil. We need to act.
Over the past two decades, Holocaust awareness globally has become a new form of collective remembrance. While events have faded, remembrance of the Holocaust has intensified. Faced with subsequent genocides in Cambodia, Rwanda and Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Holocaust has become a paradigm for genocide and Holocaust education has gained relevance.
Holocaust education enables exploration of human rights literacy in different social contexts from cognitive, social and practical perspectives. It acknowledges the need to develop a new cosmopolitan consciousness transcending national boundaries: a memory connected not only to the past but also to the belief in a common future. The cosmopolitanization of Holocaust awareness and the need to avoid such a tragedy occurring again is connected to post-national processes. Thus, educating about the dangers of racism and extreme nationalism can become an icon for a new cosmopolitan future.
At the same time we must be careful. There can be no doubt that the transformation of the Holocaust into a universal symbol of evil has made it possible to address it in different cultural contexts. But there is a substantial, inherent risk that this approach can “normalise” the Holocaust and thus diminish it. Normalisation can lead to “soft” Holocaust denial. Not aggressive, explicit denial, but denial of its core Jewish elements. In addition, there is a tendency to describe some racial tensions and conflicts as a “Holocaust” when such a comparison is inappropriate. The overuse of the term can thus cheapen it.
In my article “Nationalism and socialism are fundamentally inseparable”, I noted the centrality of cosmopolitan values to the ruling powers – and here we have it in black and white that not only does the UN agree with me, but also how Jewish influence goes hand in hand with it. All normal people hate the political changes that have taken place in recent decades, whether they be globalisation, the erasure of national identity via cosmopolitanism, or the increasingly overt anti-White racism that invokes the “holocaust” as its moral foundation.
This is why the “holocaust” myth MUST be crushed. There is no way around it and there is no way to fool the system by attempting to twist the myth to your advantage. If the “holocaust” is the symbol of universal evil the West, it logically follows that those who committed it – namely, us Whites – can be universally condemned as fundamentally morally inferior, which is why it is not just acceptable but also a righteous act to wage demographic warfare against us.
The “holocaust” myth must be destroyed before it destroys us. Until the day “holocaust” teachers are met with ridicule in every classroom in the West and questioned about why mass graves of Jews are almost non-existent, why there are no traces of Prussian blue in the “gas chamber” in Auschwitz, and why it is acceptable to rely on confessions elicited via torture in the Nuremburg trials, nothing will change.
The “holocaust” myth must be destroyed. There is no other way around it.
SOCIAL ACTIVITY. Sweden’s Nest 5 visited Lake Rämen in Dalarna last weekend to go hiking, camp and take part in wilderness competitions.
On Saturday, 5 February, members of Nest 5, together with guests from Nest 1, assembled at the most northerly bay of Lake Rämen ahead of a challenging wilderness excursion.
The morning began with the participants preparing their equipment for the long day ahead. When this was complete, Fredrik Engman gathered everyone for a rundown of the schedule for the weekend. The newly appointed wilderness activity organiser described how the weekend would consist of competitions and challenges, in which the Resistance men could earn points and compete for a glorious first place.
For the first competition on the schedule, the participants did as many push-ups as they could without resting. Next, everyone’s packs were weighed, with the heaviest pack earning the carrier the most points. When the first two competitions were over, everyone put on their packs and waited for orders to march off.
The point-scoring began with a push-up competition
The march led the participants through varied terrain. Initially, the group hiked along gravel roads and through the forest surrounding the lake. Next, the hikers crossed the icy Lake Rämen, where they enjoyed a fantastic view and saw two moose running through the frozen reeds.
The final and most strenuous section of the hike occurred when the Resistance men headed into the forest and walked up part of Limberget mountain. This was necessary in order to reach the small plateau where the camp would be made for the weekend.
The Resistance men enjoyed the view before the tough ascent
After the challenging ascent was complete, there was still no time to rest. In order for everyone to be able to enjoy hot food, water and a cosy fire, a lot of wood was needed. As such, all the participants immediately set about producing firewood. Some suitable deadwood was found, cut down and sawn up. After sawing the wood for a while, enough was prepared in order to shift the focus onto creating shelters and sleeping places.
When the camp and campfire preparations were complete, it was time for more competitions. However, before they began, the person in charge gave a brief course on how to construct a camping seat. When everyone had tried building their own seat, the formal competitions got underway. These consisted of making a fire that would burn for as long as possible, as well as boiling a litre of water from snow, without the use of a gas or spirit stove.
Deadwood is sawn and split
By this time, the sky had begun to darken. After the hard work and multiple competitions, it was decided that food and socialising should now be on the agenda. Once everyone had eaten their fill, the evening was spent in front of the fire, where the comrades could converse undisturbed and prepare a little more wood for the long night ahead. When the fire slowly started to burn out and everyone grew tired, the group went to bed and awaited the morning.
As usual, a good fire was the central feature of the camp
The first task to be completed at reveille was to restart the extinguished fire. Once the flames had provided heat for the food, water and the hikers, the dismantling of the campsite began. After the site had been cleaned up and tidied, everyone pulled on their packs and walked down towards the lake.
The area was tidied carefully before leaving
The steep slope that stood between the campsite and the lake had now been passed. After once again witnessing the wonderful view from the ice, the Resistance men gathered in formation. During the last stretch back to the cars, they walked in two lines with the flag of Tyr out in front.
When the party arrived at the other shoreline, another group of comrades were already there, awaiting their return. They had started grilling sausages, which were offered to the returning participants. The comrades had also begun ice racing with cars when the wilderness enthusiasts reached the lake. This was not an unusual sight, as the Nest has arranged similar activities before. Towards the end of the day, some of the comrades cut holes in the ice so they could bathe in the lake. When the ice bathing was over and the sausages had all been consumed, the attendees thanked one another for a pleasant weekend and said farewell.
RESISTANCE MOVEMENT. National Council member Fredrik Vejdeland explains the differences between dropouts and traitors – with illustrative examples. He also gives instructions to the national movement on how to deal with the latter.
In the latest episode of Leadership Perspective, Simon Lindberg and I spoke about defection and betrayal, after Jimmy Thunlind became a police informant and a traitor. This issue was explained further in this article. The subject has since been remarked upon by various nationalists, who have by and large all worked to smoke out this traitor. This is something we both thank and honour them for.
The purpose of this article is to examine what separates a dropout from a traitor, and to give examples of when leaving the Organisation crosses the line into betrayal. When do the dropout’s transgressions become so bad that he not only makes any future position impossible in his own organisation, but also in the national movement as a whole?
Firstly, it should be pointed out that we are very careful when it comes to labelling someone a traitor, and we never do it without solid evidence for the claim. Even if one disapproves of a dropout’s gossiping to other nationalists, he should be careful about calling him something as disparaging as a traitor.
This is the case for several reasons. We do not want to be in a situation in which the concept is inflated and we cannot differentiate the big fish from the small. Throwing out accusations that are not properly thought out, or are said in the heat of the moment, can lead to reduced credibility and other problems for us. We risk inviting anger upon ourselves – which may well be justified – and creating enemies for life.
About dropouts
In this context it should also be clarified, if it were not already apparent, that a dropout does not necessarily qualify as a traitor at all – in fact, it is extremely rare. The Nordic Resistance Movement is a volunteer organisation, through which many have come and gone over the years. Of course, this is something that happens in all other organisations – political and non-political – but perhaps more so in a revolutionary organisation that is subjected to strong external pressure from a repressive system. There have been members who have left after a few weeks or months, after realising the level of repression that comes their way (which we always warn them about beforehand). Conversely, others last for many years.
This is completely natural, and because their places are always filled with new people, I see no major problem with it. Ultimately, it is the collective units – the Organisation that wages the struggle, and the people we fight for – that are important. As long as the struggle for the survival of our people continues, it doesn’t matter if a few individuals come or go. That might sound cynical, but it’s the reality.
The important thing is that the inner core gradually grows and becomes stronger. The inner core comprises the fighters who have shown loyalty through years of trials and have become part of the Organisation’s vital infrastructure. This core has grown and become stronger over time, but it can also be decimated now and then after a split. During the coup attempt in the Organisation in 2019, some people disappeared from this core, but regardless of what they believe, not that many left the core itself, and today their places are filled by others. In other words, we have gone from being in a rebuilding phase to being in a building phase again.
When someone leaves
When people leave the Organisation, they usually do so as men; that is, in silence and without blaming someone else – and without listing thousands of examples why the Nordic Resistance Movement is so terrible (which they never voiced when they were with us). Quietly and peacefully they go into the Svensson life, for that is unfortunately where almost all of them end up, despite fine words from some about what they will do now that the Organisation no longer hinders them.
So when someone leaves the Organisation, even though it can be sad when it’s someone good, I usually focus on what the individual achieved during his or her time in the Nordic Resistance Movement. How has he or she, through hard work over a period of time, helped the Organisation move forwards? If the person left in the right way, he has points in his favour, and can potentially rejoin at a later occasion, if he so chooses.
It is very important to understand that we don’t go around beating up people who leave the Organisation. This is just as untrue as the system-media’s claim that we beat up people who “refuse to take a leaflet”. What they often “forget” to mention is that those who do not want to take a leaflet sometimes attack an activist physically or psychologically (e.g., by spitting at them), and this leads to their being reprimanded. The reaction to the dropout may change if they act in a way similar to the spitting leaflet-refuser. If the dropout crosses the line and uses his previous insight into the Organisation to conduct a smear campaign against the Organisation and his former comrades, he should not be surprised if people become angry and sometimes physical.
About traitors
It is important to note that even the people described above are not always regarded as traitors, according to our own restrained criteria. They should instead be regarded as ill-disposed quitters. When we talk about traitors, we mean those who have been bought by the system; those who go on morning TV shows and lie about our activities.
People like Jimmy Thunlind are extremely few and far between. However, a similar example is Henrik Holappa and his betrayal in 2016. Holappa appeared in newspapers and on TV, where he demonised the organisation, cooperated with left-wing extremists and wrote a book containing outright lies. What unites Thunlind and Holappa, apart from the flagrant lying, is that they both had insight into the Organisation, even though it was primarily in their respective regions (Nest 8 in Sweden, in Thunlind’s case; and Finland, in Holappa’s).
In between, there has been a Hugo Edlund or two, whose treason has been just as serious, but whose insight into the Organisation’s internal activities has been severely limited.
Traitors are usually used by the system for a limited time. Once they have gotten their five minutes of fame, they tend to be discarded just as quickly – not infrequently because they prove to be complete failures. Anders Högström made it impossible to be a “star defector” when he committed various bizarre thefts. Hugo Edlund started using cocaine, which led to his begging for 700 kronor from the system-media in return for some inside gossip. Henrik Holappa could have been a traitor megastar, but he is not exactly the most interesting person to listen to. I have never had a sensible conversation with that milksop. As for Kim Fredriksson, one might have thought he blew his chances for good when he tortured his partner and threatened to kill her two-year-old daughter, but he still shows up on TV now and then and collaborates with Antifascist Action (AFA).
A face that may unfortunately become a common sight in the future
In contrast to the people mentioned above, Jimmy Thunlind is someone the system will want to hold on to for the foreseeable future. I can easily see him sprawling out on a TV4 sofa. Thunlind is skilled at theatrics, and if he can just refrain from drinking, I believe he will hold lucrative lectures at schools and other such venues for a long time to come.
When dropping out turns into treason
With all this said, the only relevant question left is: What qualifies as treason? What in the dropout’s behaviour and actions is it that means NO ONE should have anything to do with him? Below are some examples.
Providing the police andSäpo [the Security Police] with information about former comrades and a former organisation. Both Jimmy Thunlind and Hugo Edlund have done this, according to their own statements. One should remember that the Security Police (which is directly subordinate to the government) and the Police Authorities serve the system, not the citizens or society at large. You are not doing your “social duty”, as Thunlind claims he is doing, when you relay information about the national opposition.
Providing Antifascist Action with information about former comrades and a former organisation. AFA is also part of the system, and their goal is to personally harm nationalists.
Appearing on TV shows and taking the system’s side against the national struggle. By doing this, one becomes part of the propaganda that demonises those fighting against the population replacement and the destruction of our people.
Providing the system with information about why the movement is criminal. Jimmy Thunlind claims that we issued directives to obtain hand grenades and assault rifles, as well as to blow up media buildings. Even though Thunlind’s information is false and cannot be proven, this will become a living truth within the system and will be used as a means to try to further combat the national opposition. Regardless of whether Thunlind’s claims are true or not, he sides with the system in its belief that it should be the only institution permitted to use violence in society.
What the national movement must do
As mentioned in the introduction, several nationalists have acted exceptionally in Thunlind’s case. The AFA informant Pavel Gamov has also recently been smoked out. This is how we must act! Strongly and resolutely – and united!
When treason is discovered, one should take a stand against the traitor, but never, under any circumstances, should the traitor’s side be taken against the organisation in question. It does not matter how much one dislikes an organisation or its representatives; he must never engage in schadenfreude when they are blighted by a traitor. One must go to their defence, or, at the absolute least, avoid the matter entirely.
Since his betrayal, the narcissistic Thunlind has attempted to talk about his “ideological journey” on the podcast Vita pillret (The White Pill) and has contacted his former comrades (who he just sold out to the system) in an attempt to try to find a way back into the community in some way. The door has been shut everywhere.
This resolute action is ultimately the only right and effective approach, as it sends an important signal to dropouts who might consider stepping over the line in the future.
IDEOLOGY. The leader of the Nordic Resistance Movement offers some advice to the Nordic men thinking about participating in the war against Russia.
I want...
