ACTIVISM. Resistance men from Nest 1 and Nest 8 recently conducted a public flyer distribution at the Swedish Game Fair, a large hunting event held in eastern Sweden. The Resistance Movement’s presence was much appreciated by the attendees.
The fair took place in the grounds of Tullgarn Palace, near Trosa, and had many visitors. The Resistance Movement arrived around noon and set up banners in front of the entrance. The fair’s head organizer quickly arrived and behaved like a real crybaby. He called the police, who decided to send one officer.
The event went extremely well, as there was a constant stream of people going in and out of the fair. The leaflets went like hotcakes, with over 2,500 being distributed. Many people were positive about our message, and only a few Swede-haters appeared during the day.
The lone policeman talked a lot on the phone, and after a while two of his colleagues arrived. It turned out his friends were actors in the TV program Södertäljepolisen, and they brought along an entire camera crew. Several shots were taken of the police pretending to talk with each other. They also filmed a discussion with the activity’s organizer, who verbally put them in their place. After a bit more filming, the two “police officers” left the scene.
The publication Swedish Hunting (Svensk Jakt) commented swiftly on the event, attempting to distance itself and spread lies about the Resistance Movement. The magazine should be boycotted, as it clearly takes a stand against freedom of expression and supports the system’s harassment of hunters who happen to be interested in National Socialism. In the long run, the restrictions on nationalist-minded people’s right to carry weapons will also affect the rest of the hunting community, a fact that Swedish Hunting either refuses to recognize, or is paid to ignore.
Virtually all violent crimes that occur with firearms in Sweden are committed with weapons that are already illegal. Further restrictions on the right to carry arms will only make it more difficult for law-abiding citizens to defend themselves when needed.
Those who think that free and innocent Nordic men and women should have the right to own a weapon – both for hunting and self-defense – belong in the Nordic Resistance Movement. Anyone who thinks that we should have a society in which only criminals carry weapons can continue to support “Swedish Hunting” and the current government.
TRAINING. At the end of May, Denmark’s Nest 2 held the Resistance Movement’s obligatory physical test for activists.
As a part of our worldview, we regard spiritual and bodily regeneration to be dependent on each other. Being a National Socialist in thought alone is not enough; it must also be physical – National Socialism must be lived. Is revolution even possible without a spiritual or bodily regeneration? Hardly, for a physically and spiritually weak people cannot free themselves, no matter how “right” they are.
To ensure organisation’s activists conduct their training and train properly to achieve the desired physique, regular physical tests are carried out in all Nests of the Nordic Resistance Movement throughout the entire Nordic region. The test is not in any way an “elite test”, but rather a measure to ensure the activists maintain a basic physical level. The test is based on the same requirements used by the Finnish Defence Forces.
On the weekend of 25/26 May, Nest 2 held the mandatory physical test for activists, during which everyone competed against themselves for the purpose of achieving constant improvement. All activists performed as expected.
SOCIAL ACTIVITY.On 30 May, members of the Resistance Movement from Uppland and the Norwegian Nest 1 met for a joint activity.
Amidst the finest sunny weather, the comrades put up banners, trained, bathed and had a barbecue together in order to welcome and enjoy the summer in the spirit of good comradeship.
ACTIVISM. On Thursday the 30th of May, members and activists from Nest 3 went to the Stora Coop supermarket at Eslöv for a public activity.
The response from the public was very positive, even though the politically motivated Stora Coop did everything in its power to obstruct the people from receiving our message and to remove the activists from the area.
Unfortunately for the Coop staff, neither the police, nor their bad behaviour – including physically standing in the way of the leafleting, and even putting up two signs decrying the activism – could do anything to halt the activity.
After approximately two hours, the activist in charge decided our message had been spread efficiently for the day and declared the activity over.
“We are sorry these men are standing here and giving out information we obviously don’t support or sympathise with – Coop Flygstaden.”
ACTIVISM. On Thursday 30th May, activist group 203, with the help of an activist from group 204, visited the annual market of Rabbalshede in the municipality of Tanum.
Despite the rainy weather and strong winds that met the activists at the market place, the leaflets distributed were well received by the people and many conversations took place.
An interesting discussion was had with a racial alien who pointed out he would not leave the country when the Resistance Movement comes in power. His main argument was a highly dubious claim that he pays more taxes to the state than any of the comrades present. The comrades firmly explained to the racial alien that it’s definitely not up to him to decide whether or not he would stay in the new Nordic state, and the discussion was ended there.
The comrades also tried to talk with some members of the Centre Party who had a tent at the market, but for some reason it seemed they weren’t in the mood to talk politics.
RESISTANCE MOVEMENT. During the first weekend of June, both the Norwegian and Danish branches of the Nordic Resistance Movement held their Activist Days events for 2019. Here follows a combined report from both countries.
Norway’s Activist Days was held under the slogan “Taking the Struggle to a New Level”. The Chief Editor of Frihetskamp.net, Martin Oppegaard, held a speech and Q&A on IT security, while Sweden’s Jimmy Thunlind gave an optimistic and inspiring talk which drew parallels between today’s National Socialist struggle and that of 1930s Germany.
The Norwegian National Leadership, headed by Haakon Forwald, gave a briefing and announced that going forwards the Norwegian branch will be focussing more on internal development, such as outdoor activities and lectures, with the aim of creating a better balance with outward-facing operations. This mirrors the announcement made regarding activities in Sweden during January’s Activist Days in Dalarna. The leadership also stated that Frihetskamp.net will now focus more on news and less on the Resistance Movement. News about the Movement will instead be published on Motstandsbevegelsen.org.
A Q&A session was held in which the participants were given the opportunity to ask questions to the leadership. There was also a quiz, with the winner receiving specially produced mugs with Tyr rune designs.
The tagline for Denmark’s Activist Days was “Progress, Success and Optimisation”. It included speeches by four speakers. Leader of the branch Martin Durvad spoke about the past year and the future of the struggle in Denmark. Nest Chief Kristian Niss held a motivational speech on the necessity of a strong state, while two debut speakers, Peter Bak and Viktor Clausen, spoke about National Socialism as the natural order, and youth, identity and mental illness, respectively.
New activists were appointed, and prizes were distributed to two outstanding activists for their immense efforts within the organisation over the last year. The attendees also participated in martial arts training, archery and axe throwing.
Delicious food was served in both Norway and Denmark, and there was plenty of time for discussions and good comradeship. According to those present at both Activist Days, the events were very successful and invigorating for the continuing struggle!
RESISTANCE NEWS. Erik Forsell writes about the 2012 conference held by the Jewish Renaissance Movement in Poland and their plot to turn the country into a Jewish state.
The Jewish Renaissance Movement in Poland (JRMiP) held a conference in 2012, discussing how Poland should be turned into a Jewish state. Now powerful Jews are discussing support to implement the plan, which has become increasingly obvious since the acceleration of mass-immigration into Europe in 2015. According to the plans laid out by the JRMiP, the Eastern European states which are ”refusing” to accept the influx of racial aliens are to become Jewish states. That is why the racially alien immigrants are led towards Western Europe rather than Eastern Europe.
In 2012 in Berlin, the first conference of the Jewish Renaissance Movement in Poland (JRMiP) was held. The conference, which went on for three days, was supposedly about Jewish art and population development in Poland, the leading organizer of the event being the Israeli artist Yael Bartana.
In reality it was a Zionist conference in the spirit of Benjamin Theodor Ze’ev Herzl which was about how the Jews are intent on grabbing control of Poland and turning it into a new Jewish state.
The subject discussed was completely in line with Yael Bartana’s films, which have been shown at the art museums Louisiana in Humlebæk (where the showing was financed by Nordea), Moderna Museet in Malmö, Centre Pompidou in Paris, Tate Modern in London and at the international Venice Biennale.
Bartana’s film trilogy And Europe Will Be Stunned depicts 19th- and 20th-century Europe as a historic homeland of Ashkenazi Jews.
With the help of her political movement, she aims to promote the “return” of 3.3 million Jews to the supposed birthright of their predecessors, i.e. Poland. In her film trilogy, one of the activist actors exclaims:
Allow the three million Jews that Poland has lost to return to Poland, to your country! Heal our wounds and you will heal yours. We will be together again!
The Israeli political artist Yael Bartana. Photo: Raimond Spekking (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Yael Bartana says her art depicts ”a very universal history”:
As in my earlier works I treated Israel as a kind of social laboratory, and I always used an outside perspective. These are the mechanisms and situations that can be observed around the world. [These] works are not just a history of two nations – Poles and Jews. It is a universal picture of the impossibility of living together.
The final film in the trilogy is deliberately vague in its description of whether the Jewish Renaissance Movement in Poland is a complete hallucination, an artistic project, ”or maybe a concrete and constructive suggestion that will be implemented in Poland, Europe and the Middle East in the near future”, as the work was described during the Biennale Arte in Venice in 2011.
The Polish pavilion at the Venice Biennale in 2011 was entirely composed of Jews.
Europe will be astonished
In addition to viewing Bartana’s political art, those taking part in the Jewish Renaissance conference of 2012 would see that it definitely is about a ”concrete and constructive proposal that will be implemented in Poland” and other parts of ”Europe and the Middle East”, and all ”within the near future”.
The proposal to the conference was signed by the sociologist and liberal political writer and activist Sławomir Sierakowski. In conjunction with which the manifesto of the Jewish Renaissance was published, which was to be the main topic of the conference.
Sierakowski used Bartana’s art projects as a slogan for the conference: ”And Europe will be stunned”. The Jewish Renaissance Movement does not hide the fact that they want artistic activity to translate into realpolitik.
“We believe there is no point in creating an artificial borderland between art and politics. Polish society is at present homogenous, unlike all other European countries. In our [that is, Poland’s] society there is a sort of void concerning the past, which should be filled,” said Sierakowski, whose chair stood empty during the entire conference for theatrical reasons (his character ends up being murdered in the epilogue of Bartana’s trilogy of films).
The manifest in Polish. Clickable!
Parts of the conference are published in the form of video clips. As late as this year these have caused a renewed commotion in Poland, because the debate is now raging – in some relatively narrow circles – about the real reasons why countries like Poland and Hungary are strong opponents of the invasion of black and brown races from the Third World.
The main focus of the Jewish conference really matches the politics of today very well: Racial aliens are supposed to invade the countries of Europe, apart from the countries that the Jews have chosen as sanctuaries for themselves, such as Poland, Hungary and Romania.
Scandinavia and Germany are some of the countries the Jews have rejected as sanctuaries for themselves, and are therefore planned to meet a multiracial doom through the actions of institutions like the UN and the EU.
This political course seems particularly obvious since the last wave of the invasion of racial aliens hit Europe in 2015 and is still going on.
According to the Polish net publication Odkrywamy Zakryte, the plan for the creation of a ”new Israel” in Central and Eastern Europe is that it shall be set up in an area encompassing most of the theoretical Intermarium. ”That is why this zone ought to encompass Poland, western Ukraine, former Czechoslovakia, Hungary, parts of Romania and Croatia”, they write.
Odkrywamy Zakryte are unfortunately quite unreliable most of the time and they don’t specify where this information comes from. All they do is reference statements from Henry Kissinger that he was supposed to have made the same year this conference was held.
According to said statements, Kissinger is supposed to have said that Israel will disappear as a state within ten years, in 2022.
But Kissinger’s purported statements are generally seen as fake news, despite the fact that the New York Post and the Israeli newspaper Haaretz have spread them.
Jewish power aesthetics in Yael Bartana’s visionary style.
Sweden is assisting the Jewish plans for Europe
Countries like Hungary and Poland are ostracized by the international community for being xenophobic opponents of immigration, but many people now suspect that the criticism against their policies is a targeted effort against the opposing nations.
That is also the case when the criticism is coming from top politicians like Annie Lööf and Stefan Löfvén who demand increased immigration to both Sweden and the countries opposing immigration.
It is claimed that these countries are opponents of immigration, according to the plans of the Jewish power elite.
The two party leaders mentioned above were – like Carl Bildt and Fredrik Reinfeldt – chosen to ”lead Sweden” shortly before or after having been summoned to the Bilderberg Group, where the Nobel Peace Prize winner Henry Kissinger plays a key role. He also plays a key role in the private global interest group the Trilateral Commission, which Annie Lööf became a member of in 2017.
Henry Kissinger has his fingers in many pies.
The fact that Annie Lööf did not become prime minister in last autumn’s election most likely had to do with the commotion created by the facts surrounding the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission.
She was therefore put ”on hold” and instead the government of Stefan Löfven was reformed in an undemocratic manner with the support of Annie Lööf – the so-called January agreement – which was motivated by the ”democratic” parties in the parliament wanting to prevent the ”undemocratic” Sweden Democrats from reaching a position of influence in the government.
“Sweden Friends” only see the symptoms – not the cause of the problems
Among the so-called “Sweden Friends”, who are generally opposed to immigration from the Third World, the leaders in countries like Poland and Hungary are held up as inspirations in terms of legislating immigration policies. The fewer immigrants, the better.
The leader of Hungary, Viktor Orbán, is seen by the radical elements of the Sweden Democrats as a shining beacon, being opposed to the invasion of racial aliens from the Third World and expelling subversive private political actors like George Soros.
The immigration limitations do not apply to Jews, however. They are free to settle wherever they want to. Virtually no Sweden Democrats see any problems with this. Jews often look like us due to historical race-mixing and are good at seeming well-integrated in their host societies.
Dan Korn, the famous Jew in Västergötland who worked as a rabbi in Manchester, can talk about ”us Swedes who eat Christmas ham” without arousing protests – while at the same time explaining that Swedish self-confidence has faced a negative trend in recent years.
Rabbi Dan Korn.
The reasons given include: ”In the past we used to be confident that we Swedes were the best people around; now we’re not so sure”, as if Jews would mourn the loss of confidence in Swedes.
That a Jew popular among the Sweden Democrat “patriots”, Kent Ekeroth, who previously held a high position in the Sweden Democrats, moved to Hungary when the situation in Sweden worsened for him is a telling detail. Hungary will be a future homeland for Jews like him, according to the plans of the Jewish Renaissance Movement.
Few people know – or would even care – that Viktor Orbán was appointed as prime minister of Hungary after a well-organised smear campaign directed against George Soros in particular, created by the homosexual New York Jew Arthur Finkelstein.
It wasn’t particularly hard getting the Hungarian voters to go along with the plans of Fidesz for limiting immigration from the Third World, as nobody wants multiculturalism if it afflicts them personally.
Viktor Orbán became Finkelstein’s final political project before he died.
Before that he guided his friend Benjamin Netanyahu to the position of prime minister in Israel after a smear campaign – in the form of a method which the journalist Hannes Grassegger refers to as the Finkelstein formula – against the then sitting prime minister and terrorist Shimon Peres, who was also awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1994.
Arthur Finkelstein with his friend Benjamin Netanyahu in 1999.
The Jews have no problems
The above-mentioned Shimon Peres said in a speech on the 10th of October 2007 at the Hotel Hilton in Tel Aviv that the Jews have nothing to be worried about.
”We are buying up Manhattan, Hungary, Romania and Poland. As I see it we have no problems,” he said.
”It’s all happening thanks to Israeli talents and connections,” Peres continued.
The nationalist Israeli newspaper Makor Rishon reported at the time that Peres’ speech had provoked anti-Semites in Hungary.
”Extremist right-wing” politicians in Hungary indignantly warned that Israel wanted to take over the country, Makor Rishon wrote.
The earlier referenced allegation from Odkrywamy Zakryte, regardless of its accuracy, does not contradict what Peres has evidently said, the ambitions of the Jewish Renaissance Movement, or even what the perhaps most trusted Jew in questions regarding international politics – Noam Chomsky – says:
“Israel is on the way of imploding on its own.”
Noam Chomsky refers to the untenable terror politics of Israel as the reason for Israel’s dissolution. Odkrywamy Zakryte claims it is because the most important natural resource – drinking water – is about to dry up in Israel, something that Henry Kissinger has also been concerned about.
The pre-party of the Zionist extremists
With the help of Shimon Peres, we are able to understand that the historical support of the Jewish Renaissance Movement in Poland and their plans to completely annex Poland as a Jewish state is not necessarily just a sick figment of the imagination created by a handful of Judeo-Marxist extremists with chutzpah.
On the other hand, the talks during the conference could be seen as quite typical of Marxist university culture. That is why a lot of the rationalisations regarding the demands for the restructuring of Europe sound like completely regular seminars at most universities.
The mood was relaxed for the most part, as is usually the case at university seminars where most people have almost the exact same opinions.
Marc Siegel, professor of avant-garde film-making and “queer studies” at the Goethe Institute in Frankfurt.
A former Israeli ambassador in Poland, Szewach Weiss, viewed the aspirations of the Jewish Renaissance Movement positively, even if he called it a ”fantasy”, since its manifesto has not been manifested in reality.
“Some of the postulates of this organization are quite surprising. For example, the one about giving the Hebrew language official status. Before the war the Jews of Poland did not speak Hebrew, only Yiddish,” Weiss said.
That one point of the manifesto, that Hebrew shall become an official language in Poland, means that the Jewish Renaissance Movement does not only wish to ”fill the void to the past” and recreate it, but that the people of Israel – that is, Modern Israel – should invade Poland.
The emblem symbolizing the conference of the Jewish Renaissance Movement in Poland. UN/EU and the ”people of Israel” are devouring Poland.
The Renaissance Movement’s five political points for Poland
The manifesto which the Renaissance Movement launched in conjunction with their conference has five points in its program for the coming Poland.
1. Polish citizenship for all immigrants (that is, immigrant Jews).
Immediately giving Polish citizenship to all Jewish immigrants to Poland was suggested to be expanded into automatically handing out Polish citizenship to Jews with kinship roots in Poland – even to those not actually looking for citizenship – by simply sending out passports to them via mail from Poland to Israel and the US. This would mean they wouldn’t even have to go to an embassy to pick up their passports.
“It would really serve the goals for our agenda well,” said Michał Zadara, a Jewish director born in Warsaw who still regards Poland as a more or less anti-Semitic hostile country where too few Jews live. In 2007 he won the Political Passport prize, which is said to be the Polish equivalent of the Pulitzer Prize in New York.
3.3 million Jews could change the lives of 40 million Poles, was one of Sławomir Sierakowski’s thoughts before the congress. As an echo of Barbara Lerner Spectre who, from her ”occupation base” of Paideia in Stockholm, in 2010 said that multiculturalism will mean an enormous change for Europe which must take place, Sierakowski thinks that ”the changes which will transform Poland, Europe and the Middle East will be great and difficult to achieve”.
In order to finance the anti-white European project in favour of oppressed countries and areas, harsher copyright laws were suggested – a Holocaust copyright – which will make sure the profits of the Holocaust industry’s products – whether it’s about museum visits at Auschwitz or Steven Spielberg films – will go to Jewish development projects. Such a copyright would also prevent other historical genocides from competing with the ”Jewish Holocaust”.
The Freudian author and translator Boris Buden claimed that the entire ”European Project” cannot survive unless fresh capital is brought from China. Money from the existing EU is not enough, and a free market taking care of market concerns is not enough: Political intervention is needed.
This got support from several participants. Europe not surviving without China was the dominant view, even if critics claimed that the Europeans destroy everything for all other cultures when they expand into other areas and just grab everything for their own needs.
That is why China could become yet another victim of European colonialism, even if it won’t look the same as historical colonialism. Europe won’t be able to dominate China geographically. On the other hand China risks having damage inflicted upon it by European white power.
Fortunately other empires are stronger than Europe today, relatively speaking, so Europe could end up being doomed along with its people, which was seen as a good thing.
To look upon Europe as a ”project”, whether Buden sees it as a European or a Jewish project, makes Buden step outside of ”Europe” and does not intend to be a part of it. It’s not an historical habitat with living people having their roots in its soil. It’s a socio-economic project which will be taken over and profiteered from.
Throughout the conference, Europe and the Europeans were referred to as ”the others”, a concept which many of the more prominent participants could smile at, because the idea of ”the other” in norm-critical studies is often about the white man regarding other races and cultures as belonging to ”the other” and therefore creating an ethnocentric white norm which oppresses the rest of the world.
Michał Zadara, Jewish power film director.
2. Re-integration tax covering the cost of moving 3.3 million Jews to Poland.
Obviously the conference participants did not intend on letting taxes from working Jews in Israel and the US finance their own migrant invasion of Poland. Instead the Polish people will be taxed for that purpose.
Another alternative is that taxes will be taken from all the countries of the world.
The strongest suggestion was however put forth by Michał Zadara: that taking taxes from the Germans as usual is the way to go.
“Yes, I don’t think it would be a bad idea to tax the Germans, obviously, and it would mean a fantastic precedent in which one country taxes the citizens in another. It would be a wonderful international precedent, an absurd gesture that would be wonderful,” Zadara said.
The moderator for the day, Marc Siegel, assistant professor in avant-garde film-making and queer studies at the Goethe Institute in Frankfurt, emphatically agreed with this.
3. Hebrew as Poland’s second official language.
Koray Yilmaz Günay, an activist within the anti-racist gay lobby movement in Berlin and migration commissioner for the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, demanded that there be no official languages in all of the EU. He says that national languages should be forbidden from being above Hebrew.
The subversive Jew and national economist based in Sweden, Marian Radetski, has for a long time been propagating for abolishing Swedish as a language in Sweden and replacing it with English. He thinks the same about the Polish language in Poland, his country of birth.
Sweden is a leading country in this matter, which for anti-racist reasons has consistently refused to turn Swedish into the official language in Sweden because it hasn’t been ”necessary”. On the other hand, Yiddish is an official minority language among others and it enjoys the protection of the law.
According to Günay, national languages maintain the idea of homogenous societies and homogenous cultures, which they can’t be because that creates war and conflicts.
In order to avoid anti-Semitism and oppression, Hebrew must at least be equal to the language that will replace all the national languages of the EU as the official language. Günay doesn’t say which language non-Jews in EU will be allowed to use publicly. Using English is problematic, because most British people have it as an identity-founding nationalist language.
The razing of national languages also razes the power structures which the bearers of these languages speak and write, in favour of an equal international culture.
Hebrew is supposed to be the language of the Jews because it’s natural for them. In addition it would have a re-vitalising effect on the Jewish community if the Jews were gathered around that particular language.
But Joanna Warsza, who lives in both Warsaw and Berlin, and is an activist for the Vietnamese population of Warsaw, thinks that Vietnamese is a better choice as an official second language in Poland, since the Vietnamese population today largely lives in the areas that made up the Jewish ghetto in earlier times.
That last bit was a detail in the discussion, but it shows that the language or minority Warsza is passionate about is not interesting to her in itself, but rather only for its connection to the experiences of the Jews.
4. Dissolution of the Polish state’s concordat with the Vatican.
The reason for this is that religion is a ”powerful weapon” in the hands of the Catholic Church, which must be disarmed, according to the cultural historian and sociologist Magdalena Waligorska.
Since 96 percent of Poles are Christian Catholics, there are no abortion rights and it is also hard to leave the church, which is unacceptable according to human rights, Waligorska thinks. That is why she demands there be ”an easy way out” for everyone.
The feminist writer praised in Poland, Klinga Dunin, thinks it is crazy that Catholics are forcing their infants into their religion by means of baptism, because the children are not mature enough to make the decision on their own about which religion to follow.
The fact that Jewish infants are forced to have their penises sucked by a rabbi at their circumcision ritual as a visible sign of Jewish identity without being old enough to be able to say ”no” to this is something she doesn’t bring up at all.
Dunin basically thinks there should be freedom of religion in Poland, but the existence of the Catholic Church could only be ”tolerated” in the Poland of the Jews under certain conditions: one of these being that the Catholic Church allows for women to become priests, which has become a reality in the Swedish Protestant Church, which has accommodated the demands of the Jews to a higher extent.
Herself a lesbian, Dunin demands that the Catholic Church must accept homosexual marriages.
Without these two demands, the Catholic Church cannot be allowed to exist in the coming Jewish Poland, Dunin thinks. This was appreciated by the conference participants; and even Michał Zadara thought that ”obviously the activities of the Catholic Church must be limited and changed”. Dunin’s proposal was voted in favour with the votes being 48-1.
The deep Catholic tradition of the Polish people would therefore be destroyed.
All other religions and cultural systems shall be equal to one another, which means that Judaism is to be the dominant one since the Jews in practice will run the country. That is, even more than they do today.
5. Minority house instead of a senate in the Polish parliament.
In theory, the formation of a minority house instead of a senate will prevent an oppressive majority from running roughshod over minorities that the majority see as more or less irrelevant.
In practice this means that the Jews want themselves as a national minority to rule Poland, because they will be at most of the positions as well as the most important ones in the governing assembly. As they were in the newly formed governments of the Soviet Union a hundred years ago, and today in the United States Congress and in the parliament of Ukraine where the Jews are extremely overrepresented.
These five points of the manifesto made out the sketch for how Poland will be reshaped into a Jewish state according to the Jewish Renaissance Movement in Poland.
The last day of the conference was first and foremost about Israel’s role in the Middle East, a topic worth an article of its own.
Knowledge is the best counter-weapon.
Now that the debate surrounding the Jewish problem is accelerating in what Dagens Nyheter refers to as ”the anti-Semitic Poland”, many commentators on social media have a hard time handling what they see regarding the expressed mentality of the Jews.
Loathing and anger are mixed with hatred, fear and contempt. The more sober-minded debaters speak of the value of understanding the activities of the invasive Jewish people and how they express themselves differently depending on where they operate and what they want to achieve.
The most important thing is probably to neither dismiss nor exaggerate the dangers of the subversive activities of the Jewish people, at least not in Poland or Hungary, where the acute problems surrounding the organised waves of ”refugees” are not to be found. With the knowledge of how the enemy works, half the battle has already been won.
Below you can see a two-minute summary of the conference:
ACTIVISM. Here is a report of the tumultuous activity that went down on the streets of Lund and a summary of the propaganda put forth by leftist activists and the media.
Nest 3 went to Lund on June 1 and set up on the pedestrian street just outside Stortorget. There were a lot of people out there, so the activists got a lot of exposure; discussions were held both with people who were positive and those who were negative.
After about half an hour, people from the Left Party came and placed themselves nearby. The Left Party’s Hanna Gunnarsson was present, the same one who urged her Twitter followers to destroy the Sweden Democrats’ election posters in 2018. “Tear down, paste over, destroy! Shit must be gone by tomorrow.” For this, she was prosecuted; Lund’s district court wrote the following:
The Lund District Court decided Hanna Gunnarsson’s purpose was to raise awareness and not to call for damage. The Court emphasizes that punishing incitement instances limits the constitutional freedom of expression and should therefore be applied restrictively.
Gunnarsson was released by the court; the Left Party saw no issues with her undemocratic statements, and she is now a member of parliament for the party.
To return to yesterday’s confrontation: The Left’s meeting-disruption tactic in Lund has always been to get as close to the Resistance members as possible and then scream and shout to drown out any dialogues between the activists and the people. Knowing Gunnarsson’s and the Left’s history in Lund, it’s not rocket science to understand what would happen in the next hour. During a fierce argument with Gunnarsson and her ilk, there was no talk about “Tear down, paste over, destroy,” as there were only a dozen of them.
Dividing the street between the Left and the Nordic Resistance Movement is just a rhetorical trick from the Left. Their most commonly used slogan is “No racists/Nazis on our streets.” This slogan shows how they think they own the streets. The leaflet distribution continued and several long and constructive discussions with the local residents occurred.
The Left also likes to act with more of a “Might is right” mindset than the other established parties. Their rhetoric is “soft” when they feel outnumbered, but when they feel they have the upper hand, then the slogan of “our streets” comes forth. More Leftists came to the scene, and they became more rowdy in their screaming, even using a megaphone to try to control public opinion. Several locals who were having discussions with the Resistance Movement’s activists complained that they had difficulty hearing. Gunnarsson, who previously wanted to share the streets, did not call for any silence. The police force also did not care about the din, allowing the reds to keep screeching.
Gunnarsson said to SVT:
“When they started walking along the street, a group of young people followed. I understood later that there were clashes at Ban Square.” Hanna Gunnarsson says she perceived that the counter-demonstrators knew each other and came as a group.
These “counter-demonstrators” were in fact her own youth party, Young Left, which both she and SVT try to hide away.
Notice the Young Left on the banner and the megaphone.
The Young Left group, which before the fall of the Berlin Wall was called Communist Youth, has also posted pictures of these “counter-demonstrators” on their Facebook page. The fact that Gunnarsson could not recognize people from her own youth party in Lund is nonsense. The members of her youth party also openly fraternized with infamous Antifa members. Left Party and Jonas Sjöstedt allow this to be on their election posters.
From May 1st this year.
Also interesting is how the media spins this as a demonstration. When it comes to the Nordic Resistance Movement, the (((independent))) media tries to paint the distribution as a “non-licensed demonstration,” suggesting that the movement has done something illegal when, in reality, it is not illegal. When it comes to the Young Left, however, then it is printed out as a demonstration, despite the fact that the Young Left most likely did not apply for permission last Saturday.
About an hour and a half after the start, it was decided to pack up and go home. But this is when things started to heat up. The chanting intensified, and the Left (Young Left and Antifa-Lund) followed after the activists. Now the customary propaganda would be created: “The Left drive out the Nazis from Lund!”
The left became increasingly uppity and daring, inching closer and closer until they were only two arm-lengths away from the activists. Then, the activists stopped, and turned around.
In an attempt to exacerbate the situation, the left claimed that the Resistance members who were not arrested were chased out of Lund. In fact, a handful of black-clad, masked characters did follow the group that had not been arrested by the police. A charge was made against these red “revolutionaries,” who all tucked their tails and fled. One person got so panicked, like a rabbit in front of a car, they ran straight into a parked car and collapsed. His “comrades” had run too far, and instead, just stood and watched as the activists caught up with him.
To conclude, it can also be mentioned that the reds were driven right into the waiting arms of the police. Neither this time, nor any other time have the streets of “Red Lund” belonged to anyone other than the Nordic socialists!
INTERVIEW. “For as long as we can, we should call ourselves National Socialists,” explains Fredrik Vejdeland.
Around the country, members of the Nordic Resistance Movement are being provided with internal lectures from the organisation’s national leadership. As the Movement’s leader Simon Lindberg stated in a previous interview:
We must ensure that our members not only increase in number but that they also attain a certain standard so that the organisation is strengthened proportionally with the growth in membership. An important aspect of this is ideological training and education.
In recent months, several such lectures have been held in Dalarna. Jimmy Thunlind explained how the Emperor Has No Clothes and how society has become as dishonest as that in HC Andersen’s fairytale. Simon Lindberg spoke at another meeting about self-improvement and the potential which can blossom from a person as a result of the right will and motivation.
Most recently, Fredrik Vejdeland held a talk focussing on the subject of National Socialism from a new perspective. He explained the advantages of the National Socialist ideology and how it fares in modern society.
In contrast to other nationalist-minded individuals, who reason that National Socialism is tainted and should be forgotten, Fredrik explained that National Socialism in fact constitutes the optimal defiance against the current system. National Socialism is the antithesis to modern society’s destructive thought patterns.
Fredrik Vejdeland visited Dalarna: “Nationalism is a dead end. It can yield fast success, but it will not ultimately save us from destruction.”
By putting forward five key arguments for National Socialism, Fredrik emphasises various positive aspects of the ideology. National Socialism gives us proper guidance, unlike other empty alternatives. It contributes to organisational stability. It possesses a warrior spirit without equal. It is a concrete ideology, unlike hard-to-define nationalist alternatives. And it has a strategically sustainable approach.
National Socialism represents the ultimate defiance and creates idealistic people who cannot be bought by the system. It is honourable and attracts brave men and women who are ready to fight. In response to my question as to the main thing we should take from the lecture, Fredrik said: “As long as we can, we should call ourselves National Socialists.”
Fredrik Vejdeland together with activists from Dalarna’s Nest 5
After Fredrik’s speech, I asked him a few questions, during which he promised to return to this subject in a future publication.
When did you first have the idea of holding a speech on National Socialism?
I have held speeches on National Socialism before and have also published a booklet on our world view. But the specific issues in this particular speech are ones I have thought about over the last few years.
Are there any aspects relating to National Socialism which aren’t generally discussed that you wanted to analyse in your speech?
Yes. We have already published a great many good articles, pamphlets and books on the subject. My recommendations are the Nordic Resistance Movement’s activist handbook, our political programme and the 20-year anniversary book. These explain the National Socialistic ideology in broad strokes.
What I think is missing is a more argumentative publication that explains National Socialism’s role in modern times and in the struggle. Why do we even call ourselves National Socialists when our ideology is viewed as being so tainted? Is it because of some fixed idea, pure stubbornness, or perhaps even stupidity? Or are there strategic as well as moralistic reasons for our choice? We are well acquainted with the disadvantages of professing an ideology which the system has branded as pure evil, but what are the advantages for an organisation that is motivated by and driven forward by this ideology? And which additional advantages will a National Socialist organisation have further into the future?
This speech is directed at those who are already National Socialists, but it also gives many answers to other nationalists who have not yet understood what our strategy is. My plan is that this speech – which I will give several times – will eventually result in a physical publication.
Do you see any problems with people contenting themselves with just being “regular nationalists”, even if they don’t take an active stance against National Socialism?
Nationalism is a dead end. It can yield fast success, but it will not ultimately save us from destruction. Nationalism lacks an intrinsic strength and offers no real alternative to the ruling system and its ideology. There can be brave and self-sacrificing individuals in a nationalist organisation, but a nationalist organisation in itself does not create fighters who are prepared to sacrifice everything for a higher cause.
I have no problem at all with other nationalists, as long as they do not take an active stance against National Socialism. It is not we National Socialists, or for that matter the ethnonationalists or identitarians, who have power in society and are destroying our people. I believe nationalists should always stick together against the external enemy. Those who take the system’s side against another nationalist group or figure should be seen as enemies to the cause.
How do you think the ideology of National Socialism is doing compared to other competing nationalistic ideologies or newly invented isms?
In Sweden and the Nordics, we are definitely competitive. There is a lot of focus on the Nordic Resistance Movement from abroad, which is extremely positive and bodes well for the future. To take an example of how we’re doing here in Sweden, it’s a fact that we, a National Socialist organisation, dominate alternative media in the nationalist scene, both in the number of “consumers” and successful projects. We still have the biggest demonstrations, even under the most difficult conditions, and our core of brave and self-sacrificing activists is steadily growing. So it’s not going so badly for the National Socialist struggle in Sweden.
At what age did you develop your political convictions? Did you have other political opinions before you became a National Socialist?
It’s difficult to say exactly. I became a nationalist sometime in high school and National Socialist sometime in senior high school. During the years leading to my real awakening, I was involved in some Leftist circles, without getting snared by Marxism.
I was like all the others. I saw National Socialism as pure evil, and as such I resisted it for several years. But when I really understood National Socialism, it was like I understood how the whole world was structured and what was important in life – important enough to sacrifice everything for. Since then I have only become more convinced that National Socialism is the only cure for a sick world. The National Socialist conviction is what has kept me going through all these years and filled me with motivation during hard times.
ACTIVISM. Lone member socializes with car enthusiasts and spreads propaganda in the town of Mariestad.
On Saturday the 25th of May a “cruising” was held in Mariestad, an event were 250 older American cars were put on display. It is a popular event in the town and a lot of people came out to see the cars driving around on the streets.
A member of activist group 204, from Nest 2, took advantage of the opportunity, filling the streets with propaganda stickers and distributing 150 leaflets.
The activity was received well by the people at the event, who were enlightened by the activist on what the Resistance Movement stands for in several friendly conversations. The member also received good responses from the people driving around in their cars in what was, overall, a very successful day.
IDEOLOGY. The leader of the Resistance Movement writes about whether it's right to use National Socialism's antagonists as models for our struggle.
We recently translated...
